Unpaid TSA screeners just might be what breaks the government shutdown.
One of the quirks of American politics is that conservatives and libertarians can use regular shutdowns as evidence that the federal government was never really that necessary in the first place. But 420,000 federal workers are still working, without pay, holding off a short-term disaster. At the Food and Drug Administration, for example, semi-annual factory inspections are on hold. But Department of Agriculture meat plant supervisors are still working. In the bracket of workers whose absence would constitute a national crisis, top seed must surely go to the 51,000 employees of the Transportation Security Administration. The TSA may practice intrusive security theater, but in its absence, commercial air travel in the United States would grind to a halt, creating global transportation chaos. Like other federal workers, TSA agents missed their first paycheck on Friday. More and more agents are calling out sick, either in protest or to make up for lost wages. On Saturday, 5.6 percent of officers called in sick—up from 3.3 percent a year ago. TSA head David Pekoske announced $500 bonuses. Over the weekend, airports in Houston and Miami shut down terminal checkpoints in an effort to better distribute shrinking staffs. On Monday, 7.1 percent called in sick—up from 3.1 percent a year ago, according to the agency. Wait times at the main checkpoint at Atlanta’s Hartsfield-Jackson, the nation’s busiest airport, were over an hour long on Monday morning. The American Federation of Government Employees, the union that represents the 44,000 TSA screeners, has sued the federal government on their behalf. The attrition caused by the shutdown, the TSA union rep said last week, “will create a massive security risk for American travelers.” The median TSA screener makes $40,000, according to the Bureau of Labor Statistics, and the starting salary is $15 an hour. In the New York Times, Barbara Ehrenreich and Gary Stevenson make the case that it’s time for TSA workers to strike. That would be illegal, but the situation they find themselves in—working without pay for weeks at a time—is without precedent. Other quieter consequences of the shutdown are no less devastating. But a meltdown at the airports would put a new level of pressure on Republicans to reopen the government. Fewer than one in four American adults fly more than twice each year, according to research by Ipsos. But those who do tend to be wealthy and influential, and closing the nation’s airports would make federal workers’ misery their own.Popular in News & Politics
- 最近发表
- 随机阅读
-
- 24 of the Oldest Trees in the World
- 改善旅游供给 满足游客需求
- 依托资源推动产业转型 立足生态优势打造宜居环境
- “2024 创享未来”创友年会暨2023年度雅安市“创业明星”颁奖仪式举行
- 50 Years Later: The Revolutionary 8008 Microprocessor
- 在雅安 赴一场浪漫的冰雪之约
- 楠水阁温泉酒店提升改造项目建设有序推进
- “2024 创享未来”创友年会暨2023年度雅安市“创业明星”颁奖仪式举行
- [Online Predators] Deepfake pornography haunts S. Korea
- 以述责述廉促担当抓落实
- 以书香之气浇灌精神文明之花
- 2023年全市工业园区营业收入突破1600亿元
- Garmin Fenix 8 vs. Apple Watch Ultra: The Fenix wins big on battery life
- 带回好声音 肩负新使命
- 诗润雅州春意盛 飞花雅令送祝福
- 业界首创!海信发布全球首款120吋可折叠激光电视
- 夜间献血模式“上线”
- 交通银行青岛分行发行青岛市首张社保卡“居民服务一卡通”
- 南方农村报2024新年社论
- 以书香之气浇灌精神文明之花
- 搜索
-
- 友情链接
-